Monday, August 27, 2012

What the Red Sox/Dodgers Trade Means for the Blue Jays


By
Image courtesy of Daylife via Reuters
It was the trade that shocked the baseball world; the nine player deal between the Boston Red Sox and the Los Angeles Dodgers not only had huge implications on their respective rosters, but the teams around them as well.

As rivals in the American League East, the Toronto Blue Jays are all too familiar with their foes in Beantown. And as happy as they may be so see some of those faces leave the division, the ripple effects will be felt long after those players have left town.

Basically, I think this blockbuster trade signals either one of two things; either the Red Sox are looking to clean house and rebuild the team from the ground up, or they're merely just freeing up payroll so they can spend like crazy in the offseason.

For argument's sake, let's say the Red Sox were motivated to trade Gonzalez, Beckett, Crawford and Punto for the former reason; because they want to start fresh. This is obviously good news for the Blue Jays in the short term since is makes the Red Sox a much weaker team in the short term.

However, that doesn't necessarily mean the Red Sox would be a weaker sister of the American League East for very long. As we've seen, a team like Boston has flourished in the past with a much smaller payroll and a bevvy of younger players.

A few consecutive years of smart drafting and some lucky breaks and Boston could be back in the game sooner than any of us could probably imagine. With the right scouting and front office in place, they could right the ship very quickly.

But what if the Red Sox shipped off all those guys just so they could go out and go blow their budget again on a different set of players? After freeing up over a quarter of a billion dollars from their payroll, that would certainly open up for the Red Sox management.

With that kind of bankroll, Boston could sign easily Josh Hamilton, Nick Swisher, Zack Greinke and other highly-coveted free agent players this offseason. And if that happens, it would be very very bad news for the Blue Jays and the rest of the American League East.

After all the shenanigans in Beantown these past few years, I don't think that even makes Boston a very attractive destination for free agents like Josh Hamilton and Nick Swisher anyway. It sounds like there is a clear divide in the clubhouse; that players are either against Bobby Valentine or with him.

Not that either of those guys would be free agent targets for the Blue Jays, but if marquee players can stay away from signing with the competition, that would be all the better for the Toronto Blue Jays.

Speaking of free agents, I think this trade only increases the possibility that the Blue Jays go after somebody like David Ortiz. He's been there from the start of the entire mess in Boston, and somewhere like Toronto might be looking better and better come this offseason.

This kind of situation is difficult because from a front office perspective, you can't get too wrapped up in what everybody else is doing around you. If that were the case, Toronto might have thought 2012 was the year to strike because it looked like the Yankees were getting old and falling out of contention. And now New York is poised to win another division title.

I think the perfect balance is keeping a keen eye on the competition but not letting them dictate what your team does. So while the Red Sox/Dodgers blockbuster trade does affect the Blue Jays to some extent, it ultimately shouldn't change their master plan.

5 comments:

  1. Jays ownership aren't likely to step up to the plate & outbid the Sox (or anyone else) on FA's this offseason.
    Beeston/AA will prattle on about making changes but we'll get more of the same...

    ReplyDelete
  2. This trade is good for the Blue Jays. It makes the Sox a much worse team. If they did it just to sign Hamilton and Swisher, it was an even worse move than it looks now. Frankly, it's been a few days, and I can't find a positive spin for the Sox anywhere. That has to be good for Toronto

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. At least in the short term, I think it makes Boston a much weaker team than before. The Red Sox could get better without all those guys, but the most valuable thing must be that financial flexibility. Because truth be told, I think Adrian Gonzalez is still a very good player - but at $20 million a season, he's a bit overpaid.

      Delete
  3. It's great to have financial flexibility...if you need to spend money on something. If you have an MVP type first baseman, and an all star left fielder...not sure why flexibility is so important. Basically, the Sox are someone who wants some spending money, sells his really nice tv, then needs to use the money he gets to buy a tv. Should have just kept the tv he had in the first place.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'd overpay for 2 yrs of Ortiz at this point

    ReplyDelete

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...